Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 23(2013) 3324-3329

Improving electrochemical performances of LiFePO₄/C cathode material via a novel three-layer electrode

Zheng-wei XIAO¹, Guo-rong HU², Ke DU², Zhong-dong PENG²

1. Faculty of Metallurgical and Energy Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China;

2. School of Metallurgy and Environment, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

Received 22 October 2012; accepted 10 April 2013

Abstract:

As an improvement on the conventional two-layer electrode (active material layer|current collector), a novel sandwich-like three-layer electrode (conductive layer|active material layer|current collector) for cathode material LiFePO₄/C was introduced in order to improve its electrochemical performance. LiFePO₄/C in the three-layer electrode exhibited superior rate capability in comparison with that in the two-layer electrode in accordance with charge-discharge examination. Cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy indicated that Fe³⁺/Fe²⁺ redox couple for LiFePO₄ in the three-layer electrode displayed faster kinetics, better reversibility and much lower charge transfer resistance than that in the two-layer electrode in electrochemical process. For three-layer electrode, the holes in the surface of active material layer were filled by smaller acetylene black grains, which formed electrical connections and provided more pathways to electron transport to/from LiFePO₄/C particles exposed to the bulk electrolyte.

Key words:

lithium ion cells; LiFePO4; cathode electrode configuration; three-layer electrode; electrochemical performances;

1 Introduction

Owing to the advantages of cheap raw materials, environmental friendliness, good cycle stability and appreciable capacity of 170 mA·h/g, olivine LiFePO₄ has been qualified as one of the most promising cathode materials for lithium ion cells of next generation [1-4]. But compared with the electronic conductivities of LiCoO₂ and LiMn₂O₄, 10^-3 S/cm and 2×10^-5-5×10^-5 S/cm respectively, the corresponding value of LiFePO₄ is 10^-9-10^-10 S/cm [5]. Therefore, pristine LiFePO₄ is electroactive only at a very low current density, and its direct application is hampered. So far, the techniques applied to improve the poor rate capability of pristine LiFePO₄ have mainly focused on nano-sizing [6], conductive coating [7,8] and ion doping [9] to treat LiFePO₄ itself. All the ameliorations can enhance the rate performance of LiFePO₄. According to our laboratorial experience, the synthesis of LiFePO₄/C is simple to realize.

A lot of work has been carried out to optimize the experimental conditions for LiFePO₄/C preparation and carbon content, while few research groups have tried to alter the following fabrication for cathode electrode. As a matter of fact, the improvement on the mass ratio for LiFePO₄/C, PVdF binder and electrical conductor [10], and the use of porous current collector [11] can further improve the electrochemical performance of LiFePO₄, which indicates electrode configuration for LiFePO₄ should be an indispensable part of systematic research on LiFePO₄ for its application.

In this work, as an improvement on the conventional two-layer configuration, an additional layer of acetylene black film on the surface of active material layer was applied to derive a novel sandwich-like three-layer electrode. The electrochemical performance of LiFePO₄/C cathode material can be substantially elevated in the three-layer electrode in comparison with that in the conventional two-layer electrode. The appreciable capacities for LiFePO₄/C in the three-layer electrode at high rates are comparable to the reported [12], even though optimization for its preparation has not been made.

2 Experimental

Li₂CO₃, FeC₂O₄·2H₂O and NH₄H₂PO₄ with molar ratio of 1:2:2 and a certain amount of glucose were ball-milled in anhydrous ethanol for 2.5 h with a speed of 300 r/min. The slurry obtained was dried, and the dried lump was sintered at 650 °C in an argon atmosphere for 24 h. After furnace cooling to room temperature, LiFePO₄/C was obtained.

The carbon content for LiFePO₄/C was detected according to Ref. [13]. The X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) pattern for LiFePO₄/C was derived on Philips X-pert powder diffractometer using Cu K_α radiation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL JSM- 5600LV) was used to observe the surface of the two-layer electrode and the surface and cross-section of the three-layer electrode based on the same LiFePO₄/C.

LiFePO₄/C, PVdF binder and acetylene black with mass ratio of 8:1:1 were ground with the addition of NMP solvent. The slurry was then uniformly spread over an aluminum foil current collector, which was dried at 120 °C under vacuum. For the three-layer electrode, a slurry containing acetylene black and PVdF with mass ratio of 2:1 obtained using NMP solvent was evenly coated onto the dried two-layer electrode, which was also dried at 120 °C under vacuum. Coin cells 2025 using three-layer or two-layer cathode electrodes were assembled in an argon-filled glovebox. The electrolyte was 1 mol/L LiPF₆ in a mixture of EC, EMC and DEC with volume ratio of 1:1:1. Metallic lithium was used as the counter electrode, and Celgard 2400 porous membrane was used as separator. At room temperature, LiFePO₄/C in three-layer or two-layer electrodes was galvanostatically examined at different rates in the voltage window of 2.5-4.1 V on Land BTI-40. Specific capacity calculation was based on the mass of LiFePO₄/C loaded in the cathode.

Cyclic voltammetry (CV) was performed with a Potentiostat/Galvanostat Model 273A. Three-electrode system was measured by CV measurements. The working electrode was three-layer or two-layer electrode which had undergone 0.25C charge-discharge process ten times, and metallic lithium was the counter and reference electrodes. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) for fully discharged three-layer or two-layer electrodes was carried out on Potentiostat/ Galvanostat Model 273A with Model 5210 lock-in amplifier.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Structure and carbon content of LiFePO₄/C

Figure 1 shows the XRD pattern for the as-prepared LiFePO₄/C (6.4% (mass fraction) carbon). The curve is indexed in the orthorhombic space group Pnma. The peaks on the pattern are sharp and perfect, suggesting a high degree of crystallinity for the as-prepared LiFePO₄. The pattern agrees very well with that of triphylite (JCPDS No. 40-1499), and no impurity phases can be detected.

Fig. 1 XRD patterns for as-prepared LiFePO₄/C and triphylite

3.2 SEM observation of two-layer and three-layer electrodes

The SEM images for the surface of the two-layer electrode, and the surface and cross-section of the three-layer electrode are shown in Fig. 2. Figures 2(a₁) and (a₂) show a coarse surface littered with LiFePO₄/C particles between which there are holes, resulting from the evaporation of NMP solvent and precipitation of PVdF binder in electrode drying. Smaller acetylene black grains in deep black color can be observed to evenly distribute in electrode in Fig. 2(a₁). The three-layer electrode is plain with just few pores far smaller in size than those in the surface of two-layer electrode, as shown in Figs. 2(b₁) and (b₂). An electrode with a planar surface can evenly distribute current and exhibits lower polarization than one with a coarse surface in electrochemical process. As shown in Fig. 2(c₂), the LiFePO₄/C particles in the surface of active material layer are well in contact with acetylene black grains filling up the superficial holes. Except for the surface, no big holes in the active material layer are observed, indicating the even distribution of LiFePO₄/C particles and acetylene black grains in the active material layer, as shown in Fig. 2(c₁).

3.3 Rate performances of LiFePO₄/C in two-layer and three-layer electrodes

In Fig. 3(a), the typical charge-discharge profiles for LiFePO₄/C in the three-layer and two-layer electrodes at 0.25C and 1C are indicated. The 0.25C charge-discharge curves for both electrodes show a flat plateau at around 3.45 V (vs Li⁺/Li), which is the voltage at which both the lithium insertion and extraction at room temperature proceed in a two-phase reaction between LiFePO₄ and FePO₄ [14]. At 0.25C, the discharge capacities for LiFePO₄/C in the three-layer and two-layer electrodes are 151.2 and 149.8 mA·h/g, respectively, showing a negligible difference of 1.4 mA·h/g, but at 1C, the corresponding values are 143.5 and 125.7 mA·h/g, respectively, demonstrating a bigger difference of 17.8 mA·h/g, a value comprising more than 10% of the theoretical capacity of 170 mA·h/g.

Fig. 2 SEM images of surface of two-layer cathode electrode (a₁) and (a₂), surface (b₁, b₂), cross section (c₁, c₂) of three-layer cathode electrode with arrows in (c₂) indicating holes in the surface of active material layer being filled up by acetylene black grains

It is worth noting that at 0.25C the discharge curve for the three-layer electrode exhibits a slightly higher voltage plateau than that for the two-layer one, but at 1C the difference between the two electrodes’ discharge plateaus is significant. At 1C, the discharge voltage for the two-layer electrode is sloping down much faster than that for the three-layer electrode. In addition, the charge-discharge plateau voltages for the three-layer electrode are much better kept at around 3.45 V than those for the two-layer electrode. The results above suggest that three-layer electrode configuration can reduce the polarization during the charge-discharge process, in which the higher the rate is, the larger the polarization is. Therefore, the advantageous effect of the improved electrode configuration on the charge- discharge performance of LiFePO₄/C is reflected in longer charge-discharge plateaus and well-kept charge- discharge plateau voltage at around 3.45 V, which are indicative of improved electrochemical performance.

Further evidence for the positive effect of three-layer configuration on the electrochemical performance of LiFePO₄/C cathode material is shown in Fig. 3(b). From low rate 0.25C to high rate 2C, the discharge capacities for LiFePO₄/C in both electrodes drop more or less, respectively, but in comparison, LiFePO₄/C in the three-layer electrode exhibits a much higher discharge capacity than that in the two-layer electrode at the same rate. Even at 3C, LiFePO₄/C in the three-layer electrode displays a discharge capacity of 115 mA·h/g, which is comparable to that reported in a novel work [12]. Meanwhile, at 2.5C and 3C, the two-layer electrode can be hardly discharged in the voltage window of 2.5-4.1 V, which is due to the immense polarization exhibited in a high current density process. The work shows that betterment in electrode configuration can be supplementary to modification on pristine LiFePO₄ to further improve its rate capability.

Fig. 3 Charge-discharge profiles (a) and rate capacities (b) for LiFePO₄/C cathode material in three-layer and two-layer electrodes

3.4 CV and EIS measurements on two-layer and three-layer electrodes

There is a significant difference between the CV curves for the two electrodes based on the same LiFePO₄/C sample but with different configurations as shown in Fig. 4. For the Fe³⁺/Fe²⁺ redox couple in the three-layer electrode, the redox peaks are located at 3.63 and 3.24 V, respectively, with a difference of 0.39 V, and the corresponding values for that in two-layer electrode are 3.78 and 3.06 V, respectively, with a much bigger difference of 0.72 V, indicating a much smaller polarization for three-layer electrode than two-layer electrode at the same current density.

Fig. 4 Cyclic voltammegrams for three-layer and two-layer electrodes based on same LiFePO₄/C sample at scanning rate of 0.1 mV/s

In addition, the redox peaks for Fe³⁺/Fe²⁺ redox couple in the three-layer electrode are sharper and higher than those in the two-layer electrode. All above indicate that Fe³⁺/Fe²⁺ redox couple in the three-layer electrode exhibits faster kinetics and better reversibility in electrochemical process. Therefore, three-layer electrode configuration facilitates redox, reduces polarization and increases reversibility for Fe³⁺/Fe²⁺ redox couple in electrochemical process.

The typical Nyquist and Bode plots for the two electrodes are shown in Fig. 5. The depressed semicircle in the moderate frequency region is attributable to the charge transfer process, and the tilted straight line in low frequency region corresponds to the Li⁺ diffusion process. The numerical value of the diameter of the semicircle on the Z_real axis is approximately equal to the charge transfer resistance (R_ct) or the so-called interfacial resistance [15].

Figure 5(a) shows a significant drop in the interface impedance, from 1500 to 250 Ω, observed after the addition of the conductive layer. In the Bode plot of Fig. 5(b), the three-layer electrode also exhibits much smaller impedance than the two-layer electrode in the frequency range of 0.01-1000 Hz. Thus, the improvement in the electrode configuration facilitates charge transfer in electrochemical process for LiFePO₄/C cathode material and hence reduces electrode polarization.

Fig. 5 Nyquist (a) and Bode (b) plots for three-layer and two-layer electrodes based on same LiFePO₄/C sample

3.5 Improved electrochemical performances of LiFePO₄/C due to three-layer configuration

The higher rate capacity, faster kinetics, better reversibility and lower charge transfer resistance for the three-layer electrode than those for the two-layer electrode can be attributed to the improved electrode configuration. For Li⁺ extraction from and insertion into LiFePO₄ crystals in electrode process, equivalent number of electrons are involved at the same spot. By contrast, if LiFePO₄ particles are not in good contact with electrical conductor, the transport of electrons to/from these spots will be reflected in additional polarization and, hence, in a lower reversible capacity [16].

Generally, none of the routes employed to synthesize LiFePO₄/C can achieve a perfectly continuous carbon coating on each one of the LiFePO₄ particles. As shown in Fig. 6(a), if the LiFePO₄ particles exposed to the bulk electrolyte are not well-coated with carbon, the transport of electrons to/from LiFePO₄ crystals in them will be exclusively dependent on LiFePO₄/C particles themselves. Therefore, it will be a reason for sluggish electronic kinetics for those LiFePO₄ crystals in electrochemical process. To the LiFePO₄/C particles inner the active material layer, their contacts with evenly distributed acetylene black grains can counterbalance the adversity of unavoidable carbon discontinuity. In Fig. 6(b), conductive layer ensures electron transport to/from these superficial LiFePO₄/C particles through more pathways, which apparently leads to faster electron transport to/from those LiFePO₄ crystals in them. So LiFePO₄/C in the three-layer electrode substantially exhibits improved electrochemical performances mainly because of the faster electronic kinetics.

Fig. 6 Sketch for two-layer (a) and three-layer (b) cathode electrodes with arrows indicating pathways for electron transport during charge-discharge process

Because of the promising LiFePO₄ cathode material, the conventional two-layer electrode configuration is inadequate which is only suitable for those (LiCoO₂ and LiMn₂O₄) with sufficiently high conductivities. The three-layer electrode concept is absolutely different from just improving acetylene black content in the two-layer electrode, for the conductive layer can be reduced to be as thin as it can be, which will lead to very limited influence on the density of the cathode. With no doubt, the improvement in electrode configuration is a very important part of the work for the commercialization of LiFePO₄ as a cathode material for lithium ion cells.

4 Conclusions

1) Distinct from the reported techniques to modify pristine LiFePO₄, a sandwich-like three-layer electrode (conductive layer|active material layer|current collector), for the cathode material has been introduced to improve its electrochemical performance.

2) LiFePO₄/C in the three-layer electrode shows a much better rate capability than that in the two-layer electrode according to charge-discharge examination. In three-layer electrode, Fe³⁺/Fe²⁺ redox couple in the cathode material exhibits faster kinetics, better reversibility and lower charge transfer resistance than that in the two-layer electrode in accordance with CV and EIS measurements.

3) In three-layer electrode, the conductive layer forms conductive connections between superficial LiFePO₄/C particles in active material layer and provides more pathways for electron transport to/from LiFePO₄ crystals in them in electrochemical process. As a result, electrons can be faster transported to/from those active material crystals.

References

[1] LI Y D, ZHAO S X, NAN C W, LI B H. Electrochemical performance of SiO₂-coated LiFePO₄ cathode materials for lithium ion battery [J]. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2011, 509(3): 957-960.

[2] XIAO Zheng-wei, HU Guo-rong, DU Ke, PENG Zhong-dong, DENG Xin-rong. High density LiFePO₄/C composite cathode material for lithium ion batteries [J]. The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2007, 17(12): 2040-2045. (in Chinese)

[3] KIM J, KIM H, PARK I, PARK Y U, YOO J K, PARK K Y. LiFePO₄ with an alluaudite crystal structure for lithium ion batteries [J]. Energy and Environmental Science, 2013, 6(3): 830-834.

[4] ZHOU X, WANG F, ZHU Y, LIU Z. Graphene modified LiFePO₄ cathode materials for high power lithium ion batteries [J]. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2011, 21(10): 3353-3358.

[5] CHUNG S Y, BLOKING J T, CHIANG Y M. Electronically conductive phospho-olivines as lithium storage electrodes [J]. Nature Materials, 2002, 1(2): 123-128.

[6] LIU Y H, ZHANG W, ZHU Y J, LUO Y T, XU Y H, BROWN A, CULVER J N, LUNDGREN C A, XU K, WANG Y, WANG C S. Architecturing hierarchical function layers on self-assembled viral templates as 3D nano-array electrodes for integrated Li-ion microbatteries [J]. Nano Letters, 2013, 13(1): 293-300.

[7] SU L W, JING Y, ZHOU Z. Li ion battery materials with core-shell nanostructures [J]. Nanoscale, 2011, 3(10): 3967-3983.

[8] TANG Hao, TAN Long, XU Jun. Synthesis and characterization of LiFePO₄ coating with aluminum doped zinc oxide [J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2013, 23(2): 451-455.

[9] DING Yan-huai, ZHANG Ping. Effect of Mg and Co-doping on electrochemical properties of LiFePO₄ [J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2012, 22(10): s153-s156.

[10] ZANE D, CAREWSKA M, SCACCIA S, CARDELLINI F, PROSINI P P. Factor affecting rate performance of undoped LiFePO₄ [J]. Electrochimica Acta, 2004, 49(25): 4259-4271.

[11] YAO M, OKUNO K, IWAKI T, KATO M, TANASE S, EMURA K, SAKAI T. LiFePO₄-based electrode using micro-porous current collector for high power lithium ion battery [J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2007, 173(1): 545-549.

[12] XU Z H, XU L, LAI Q Y, JI X Y. Microemulsion synthesis of LiFePO₄/C and its electrochemical properties as cathode materials for lithium-ion cells [J]. Materials Chemistry Physics, 2007, 105(1): 80-85.

[13] BELHAROUAK I, JOHNSON C, AMINE K. Synthesis and electrochemical analysis of vapor-deposited carbon-coated LiFePO₄ [J]. Electrochemistry Communications, 2005, 7(10): 983-988.

[14] HU Guo-rong, XIAO Zheng-wei, PENG Zhong-dong, DU Ke, DENG Xin-rong. Preparation of LiFePO₄ for lithium ion battery using Fe₂P₂O₇ as precursor [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2008, 15(4): 531-534.

[15] LIU H, CAO Q, FU L J, LI C, WU Y P, WU H Q. Doping effects of zinc on LiFePO₄ cathode material for lithium ion batteries [J]. Electrochemistry Communications, 2006, 8(10): 1553-1557.

[16] DOMINKO R, GABERSCEK M, DROFENIK J, BELE M, PEJOVNIK S, JAMNIK J. The role of carbon black distribution in cathodes for Li ion batteries [J]. Journal of Power Sources, 2003, 119-121(1): 770-773.

利用新颖的三层电极提高LiFePO₄/C正极材料的电化学性能

肖政伟¹，胡国荣²，杜 柯²，彭忠东²

1. 昆明理工大学 冶金与能源工程学院，昆明 650093；

2. 中南大学 冶金与环境学院，长沙 410083

摘  要：对常用的两层电极(活性材料层|集电极)进行改进，提出一种新颖的夹心状三层电极(导电材料层|活性材料层|集电极)以提高LiFePO₄/C的电化学性能。充放电测试表明：相比两层电极，三层电极中LiFePO₄/C表现出更优的倍率性能。循环伏安和电化学阻抗测试表明：相比两层电极，三层电极中LiFePO₄/C材料中的Fe³⁺/Fe²⁺氧化还原电对表现出更快的氧化还原速度。更好的可逆性能以及更低的电荷转移阻抗。在三层电极中，活性材料层表层中与LiFePO₄/C颗粒尺寸相当的孔洞被粒径小得多的乙炔黑微粒填充，形成LiFePO₄/C颗粒间的导电连接，为暴露在电解液主体LiFePO₄/C颗粒中的LiFePO₄晶体提供更多运输电子到达或离开的路径。

关键词：锂离子电池；LiFePO₄；正极构造；三层电极；电化学性能

(Edited by Chao WANG)

Foundation item: Project (2010ZCO51) supported by Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province; Project supported by Analysis and Testing Foundation (2009-041) and Starting Research Fund (14118245) from Kunming University of Science and Technology

Corresponding author: Zheng-wei Xiao; Tel/Fax: +86-871-5916662; E-mail:csuxiao@163.com

DOI: 10.1016/S1003-6326(13)62871-X

Abstract: As an improvement on the conventional two-layer electrode (active material layer|current collector), a novel sandwich-like three-layer electrode (conductive layer|active material layer|current collector) for cathode material LiFePO₄/C was introduced in order to improve its electrochemical performance. LiFePO₄/C in the three-layer electrode exhibited superior rate capability in comparison with that in the two-layer electrode in accordance with charge-discharge examination. Cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy indicated that Fe³⁺/Fe²⁺ redox couple for LiFePO₄ in the three-layer electrode displayed faster kinetics, better reversibility and much lower charge transfer resistance than that in the two-layer electrode in electrochemical process. For three-layer electrode, the holes in the surface of active material layer were filled by smaller acetylene black grains, which formed electrical connections and provided more pathways to electron transport to/from LiFePO₄/C particles exposed to the bulk electrolyte.