3+. As the sodium ions between the double electric layer and the internal inter-crystal layer are replaced by other ions, the physical properties of the soil change significantly. The results show a consistent distribution pattern of Mg2+/Ca2+ in the soil after the electro-osmosis test, which is higher at the cathode than at the anode. The removal efficiency and energy consumption of heavy metals in the soil are calculated using the following formula:
1) Calculation of the removal rate
Because the metal ions are accumulated around the cathode eventually, the soil near the cathode will be treated centrally; the copper content in this region would not be taken into account in the final calculation.
(12)
where Er is the final removal rate of heavy metals; mb is the quality of heavy metals in the soil added before the test (g); ma is the mass of heavy metals remaining in the soil after the test (g);
2) Calculation of the energy consumption
(13)
where Ec is the energy consumption per unit mass of contaminants (kJ/g); mc is the final removal quality of the contaminants/g;The final removal rates of copper for the EKG and iron electrodes are 38.3% and 33.3%, respectively. According to the measurement data of iron ions, the Fe3+/Fe2+ produced in the anode gather near the anode and a small number of ions migrate to the cathode to form precipitates in the alkaline environment. Combined with the data analysis of the ion test data, some of the copper ions in the soil underwent the following precipitation reaction, with the copper ions gradually concentrating near the cathode:
Cu2++2OH–(aq)→Cu(OH)2↓ (14)
The copper ion content measured in electro- osmotic drainage water at the end of the test is 0.16 mg/L. The migration ability of Fe3+/Fe2+ is weak and has a smaller contribution to the effect of electro-osmosis. Low-order and small ions have stronger migration abilities, resulting in the migration of water molecules, which is the key factor for determining the effect of electro-osmosis [19, 20]. The values of power consumption per unit mass of contaminants for EKG and iron are 1.895 and 1.989 kJ/g, respectively.
Figure 8 Distribution of copper ion mass fraction in soil
3.3.2 Change of soil microstructure
Quantitative analysis of the porosity distribution and fractal dimension of soil in different positions after electro-osmosis were analyzed [21]. The microcosmic mechanism and the change in the electrical properties of heavy metal contaminated soils are further explored to provide a reference for establishing the relationship between microstructure changes and macroscopic electrical properties. The main parameters selected are apparent porosity (the ratio of the pore area to the total area) and the degree of roundness R0 (which describes the proximity of the object’s trait to a circle) [22].
Image J software is used to denoise the image and to divide the threshold value. After obtaining the binarized image, the main analysis data are shown in Table 3.
The data show that the cohesive clay in the undisturbed soil is mostly characterized by an empty honeycomb structure. The connections between the clay particles are mostly edge-side and edge-face. The pore volume is small without directional arrangement, but the average area is larger with an average of 1.6231 μm2. Under the action of an electric field, the soil after electro- osmosis showed a clump-like structure, and the cementing condition between the soils was obviously improved with the surface-to-surface contact and embedded contact.
After electro-osmosis, the number of pores increased, however, the average area decreased, with an average area value in the range of 0.9100–1.0504 μm2. The roundness of the pores in the soil tended to increase after electro-osmosis, and the apparent porosity decreased by 27%, with some minor differences between the soil microstructure of the EKG and iron electrode.
3.3.3 Change in EKG microstructure
To evaluate the degree of overlap between the stainless steel fibers and analyze the conductive structure of EKG materials quantitatively, this study used the microstructure analysis of cohesive soils as a reference and defined the area of overlap between stainless steel fibers as the “lap joint”.
According to the geotextile fiber conductive model, each stainless steel fiber in the EKG electrode is assumed to have a small resistance. According to the basic electrical principle, if all the resistances are connected in parallel, then the resistance is calculated as follows:
(15)
After the test, EKG electrodes were cut at different positions on the anode, and the distances from the bottom edge were 1 cm (S2), 7 cm (S3), and 13 cm (S4), respectively. Then, scanning electron microscopy analysis was performed using the QUANTAFEG650 field emission scanning electron microscope.
Table 3 Summary of quantitative analysis of soil micro-parameters
Figure 9 SEM images:
To determine the optimal magnification for the microstructural analysis of EKG electrode materials, this study used the relationship between the soil pores and the geotextile “lap joint” along with the existing research results of the microstructures of cohesive soils. The best magnification for analyzing the EKG electrodes was found to be approximately 200 times based on the inverse ratio of the pore area. Image J software was used to obtain the binarized image, the main analysis data obtained are shown in Table 4.
According to the data analysis and microstructure analysis, the stainless steel fibers are arranged in parallel in the EKG electrode before the electro-osmosis process. The main conductive modes of the stainless steel fibers are in accordance with parallel connections, and the different stainless steel fibers have less overlap with each other.
Compared with the arrangement of the stainless steel fibers and the conductive structure before electro-osmosis, the number of “lap joints” increased. Thus, with more overlap between the stainless steel fibers, the electrical conductivity of the EKG electrode decreased with time. The numbers of “lap joints” in samples S2, S3 and S4 are 514, 267 and 69, respectively, indicating that the conductivity at the bottom of the anodic geotextile significantly decreased. This result is also consistent with the change trend of the soil water content. According to the microstructural analysis, the soil is partially filled with “lap joints” of stainless steel fibers during the electro-osmosis process, forming an agglomerated structure.
4 Conclusions
A comprehensive comparison of the electro-osmosis treatments of heavy metal contaminated soil using EKG materials and iron electrodes is presented in terms of both theoretical analysis and experimental research. The main conclusions of this study are as follows.
1) This study found that the average cathode contact resistance of iron is 60% smaller than that of EKG, whereas the average anode contact resistance of EKG is 56% smaller than that of iron.
2) The average temperatures of the soil at the cathode and anode of the iron electrode are 48.47 °C and 26.98 °C, respectively. The EKG electrode has a lower coefficient of energy consumption than the iron electrode, which increases greatly at approximately 18 h.
3) The results show linear fitting relationships between temperature and conductivity and between the soil and pore water conductivities in the process of electro-osmosis. The values of the power consumption per unit mass of contaminants for EKG and iron are 1.895 and 1.989 kJ/g, respectively. These results are helpful for understanding the change trend of the conductivity under multi-field coupling, which provides a reference for the variation in the electrical parameters during electro-osmosis.
Table 4 Summary of quantitative analysis of EKG micro-parameters
4) The data show that the cohesive clay in the undisturbed soil primarily has an empty honeycomb structure. The connections between the clay particles are mostly edge-side and edge-face. The pore volume is small without directional arrangement, but the average area is larger with an average of 1.6231 μm2. After electro-osmosis, the number of soil pores increases, but the average area decreases, with an average area of 0.9100–1.0504 μm2. The roundness of pores in the soil shows an increasing trend after electro-osmosis, and the apparent porosity decreases by 27%.
5) Compared with the arrangement of stainless steel fibers and the conductive structure before electro-osmosis, the number of “lap joints” increases after electro-osmosis, indicating greater overlap between the stainless steel fibers. As a result, the soil is partially filled with “lap joints” of stainless steel fibers during the electro-osmosis process, forming an agglomerated structure. These changes affect the overall conductivity of the EKG material. To improve the conductivity of the EKG material, textile technology can be improved and researched; further study is required to improve the EKG electrode.
References
[1] IWATA M, TANAKA T, JAMI M S. Application of electro-osmosis for sludge dewatering—A review [J].Drying Technology, 2013, 31(2): 170–184.
[2] MAHMOUD A,OLIVIERJ, VAXELAIRE J, HOADLEYA F A. Electrical field: A historical review of its application and contributions in wastewater sludge dewatering [J].Water Research,2010, 44(8): 2381–2407.
[3] TUAN P A, MIKA S,PIRJOI. Sewage sludge electro- dewatering treatment—A review [J].Drying Technology, 2012,30(7): 691–706.
[4] KANIRAJ S R, YEE J H S. Electro-osmotic consolidation experiments on an organic soil [J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2011, 29(4): 505–518.
[5] RISCO C, LOPEZ-VIZCAINO R, SAEZ C, YUSTRES A, CANIZARES P, NAVARRO V, RODRIGO M. Remediation of soils polluted with 2,4-D by electrokinetic soil flushing with facing rows of electrodes: A case study in a pilot plant [J]. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 285: 128–136.
[6] FIGUEROA A, CAMESELLE C, GOUVEIA S, HANSEN H K. Electrokinetic treatment of an agricultural soil contaminated with heavy metals [J]. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering, 2016, 51(9): 691–700.
[7] HE F, GAO J, PIERCE E, STRONG P J, WANG H, LIANG L. In situ remediation technologies for mercury- contaminated soil [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2015, 22(11): 8124–8147.
[8] MULLIGAN C N, YONG R N, GIBBS B F. An evaluation of technologies for the heavy metal remediation of dredged sediments [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2001, 85(1, 2): 145–163.
[9] HU Yu-chen, WANG Zhao, ZHUANG Yan-feng. Experimental studies on electro-osmotic consolidation of soft clay using EKG electrodes [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2005, 27(5): 709–714. (in Chinese)
[10] JONES C J F P, LAMONT-BLACK J, GLENDINNING S. Electrokinetic geosynthetics in hydraulic applications [J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2011, 29(4): 381–390.
[11] GLENDINNING S, JONES C J F P, PUGH R C. Reinforced soil using cohesive fill and electrokinetic geosynthetics (EKG) [J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, ASCE, 2005, 5(2): 138–146.
[12] FOURIE A B, JONES C J F P. Improved estimates of power consumption during dewatering of mine tailings using electrokinetic geosynthetics (EKGs) [J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2010, 28(2): 181–190.
[13] KALUMBAD,GLENDINNING S,ROGERS C D F, TYRER M, BOARDMAN D I. Dewatering of tunneling slurry waste using electrokinetic geosynthetics [J].Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE, 2009, 135(11): 1227– 1236.
[14] PAPADOPULOS F, SPINELLI M, VALENTE S, FORONI L, ORRICO C, ALVIANO F. Common tasks in microscopic and ultrastructural image analysis using Image J [J]. Ultrastructural Pathology, 2007, 31(6): 401–407.
[15] FRIEDMAN S P. Soil properties influencing apparent electrical conductivity: A review [J]. Computer and Electronics in Agriculture, 2005, 46(1–3): 45–70.
[16] FETZER C A. Electro-osmotic stabilization of West Branch dam [J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE, 1967, 93(4): 85–106.
[17] TAO Yan-li, ZHOU Jian, GONG Xiao-nan, HU Ping-chuan. Electro-osmotic dehydration of hangzhou sludge with selected electrode arrangements [J]. Drying Technology, 2016, 34(1): 66–75.
[18] NIU Q F, FRATTA D, WANG Y H. The use of electrical conductivity measurements in the prediction of hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2015, 522: 475–484.
[19] SADEGHALVAD B, AZADMEHR A R, MOTEVALIAN H. Statistical design and kinetic and thermodynamic studies of Ni(II) adsorption on bentonite [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2017, 24(7): 1529–1536.
[20] ZHOU Zi-long, DU Xue-ming, CHEN Zhao, ZHAO Yun-long. Grouting diffusion of chemical fluid flow in soil with fractal characteristics [J]. Journal of Central South University, 2017, 24(5): 1190–1196.
[21] LIU Chun, SHI Bin, TANG Chao-sheng. Quantification and characterization of microporosity by image processing, geometric measurement and statistical methods: application on SEM images of clay materials [J]. Applied Clay Science, 2011, 54(1): 97–106.
[22] DATHE A, EINS S, NIEMEYER J, GEROLD G. The surface fractal dimension of the soil–pore interface as measured by image analysis [J]. Geoderma, 2001, 103(1, 2): 203–229.
(Edited by FANG Jing-hua)
中文导读
EKG和铁电极加固修复污染土对比研究
摘要:本文从理论分析和实验研究两方面综合比较了EKG(Electrokinetic Geosynthetics)电极和铁电极对重金属污染土壤的电渗处理效果。采用电学参数评价加固效果,结果显示温度和电导率之间以及温度与土壤和孔隙水电导率之间具有一定的线性关系。铁电极试验组阴极的平均阴极接触电阻比 EKG电极试验组的小60%,而EKG试验组的平均阳极接触电阻比铁电极试验组的小56%。EKG电极试验组和铁电极试验组单位质量污染物的能耗分别为1.895 kJ/g和1.989 kJ/g。电渗后土壤孔隙数量增加,但平均面积减少,平均面积为0.9100~1.0504 μm2。通过微观结构分析,获得了较高的电渗效率,实现了宏观和微观参数间的有效分析和利用。
关键词:EKG;污染土;电导率;离子运移;微观结构
Foundation item: Project(51378469) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China; Project(2017C33034) supported by the Application Research of Public Welfare Technology in Zhejiang Province, China; Project(LQ18E080001) supported by the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China; Project(12017A610304) supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo City, China
Received date: 2017-12-22; Accepted date: 2018-06-21
Corresponding author: XIE Xin-yu, PhD, Professor; Tel: +86-13362105001; E-mail: xiexinyu@zju.edu.cn; ORCID: 0000-0001-8582- 0857